XPath and XPointer/XPath Basics
Chapter 1 provided sketchy information about using XPath. For the remainder of the book, you'll get details aplenty. In particular, this chapter covers the most fundamental building blocks of XPath. These are the "things" XPath syntax (covered in succeeding chapters) enables you to manipulate. Chief among these "things" are XPath expressions, the nodes and node-sets returned by those expressions, the context in which an expression is evaluated, and the so-called string-values returned by each type of node.
The Node Tree: An Introduction
You'll learn much more about nodes in this chapter and the rest of the book. But before proceeding into even the most elementary details about using XPath, it's essential that you understand what, exactly, an XPath processor deals with.
Consider this fairly simple document:
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="battleinfo.xsl"?> <battleinfo conflict="WW2"> <name>Guadalcanal</name> <!-- Note: Add dates, units, key personnel --> <geog general="Pacific Theater"> <islands> <name>Guadalcanal</name> <name>Savo Island</name> <name>Florida Islands</name> </islands> </geog> </battleinfo>
As the knowledgeable human eye — or an XML parser — scans this document from start to finish, it encounters signals that what follows is an element, an attribute, a comment, a processing instruction (PI), whatever. These signals are of course the markup in the document, such as the start and end tags delimiting the elements.
XPath functions at a higher level of abstraction than this simple kind of lexical analysis, though. It doesn't know anything about a document's tags and thus can't communicate anything about them to a downstream application. What it knows about, and knows about intimately, are the nodes that make up the document: the discrete chunks of information encapsulated within and among the markup. Furthermore, it recognizes that these chunks of information bear a relationship to one another, a relationship imposed on them by their physical arrangement within the document. (such as the successively deeper nesting of elements within one another) Figure 2-1 illustrates this node-tree view of the above document as seen by XPath.
There a few things to note about the node tree depicted in Figure 2-1:
- First, there's a hierarchical relationship among the different "things" that make up the tree. Of course, all the nodes are contained by the document itself (represented by the overall figure). Furthermore, many of the nodes have "offshoot" nodes. The battleinfo element sits on top of the outermost name element, the comment, and the geog element (which are all in turn subordinate to battleinfo).
- Some discrete portions of the original document contribute to the hierarchical nature of the tree. The elements (solid boxes) and their offspring — subordinate elements, text strings (dashed boxes), and the comment — are connected by solid lines representing true hierarchical relationships. Attributes, on the other hand, add nothing to the structure of the node tree (although they do have relationships, depicted with dotted-dashed lines, to the elements that define them). And the xml-stylesheet PI at the very top of the document is connected to nothing at all.
- Finally, most subtly yet most importantly, there is not a single scrap of markup in this tree. True enough, the element, attribute, and PI nodes all have names that correspond to bits of the original document's markup (such as the elements' start and end tags). But there are no angle brackets here. All that the XPath processor sees is content, stacked inside a tower of invisible boxes. The processor knows what kind of box each thing is, and if applicable it knows the box's name, but it does not see the box itself.
If you've never worked with XPath before, you may be expecting its syntax to be XML-based. That's not the case, though. XPath is not an XML vocabulary in its own right. You can't submit "an XPath" to an XML parser — even a simple well-formedness checker — and expect it to pass muster. That's because "an XPath" is meant to be used as an attribute value.
Chapter 1 discussed why using XML syntax for general-purpose languages, such as XPath and XPointer, is impractical. As mentioned there, the chief reason might be summed up as: such languages are needed in the context of special-purpose languages, such as XSLT and XLink. Expressing the general-purpose language as XML would both make them extremely verbose and require the use of namespaces, complicating inordinately what is already complicated enough.
"An XPath" consists of one or more chunks of text, delimited by any of a number of special characters, assembled in any of various formal ways. Each chunk, as well as the assemblage as a whole, is called an XPath expression.
Here's a handful of examples, by no means comprehensive. (Don't fret; there are more detailed examples aplenty throughout the rest of the book.)
- Locates an element, in some relative context, whose name is "taxcut"
- Locates the document root of some XML instance document
- Locates the root element of an XML instance document, only if that element's name is "taxcuts"
- Locates all child elements of the root taxcuts element whose names are "taxcut"
- The number 2001
- The string "2001"
- Locates all child elements of the root taxcuts element, as long as those child elements are named "taxcut" and have a year attribute whose value is the string "2001"
- Abbreviated form of the preceding
- 2001 mod 100
- Calculated remainder after dividing the number 2001 by 100 (that is, the number 1)
- /taxcuts/taxcut[@year="2001"]/amount mod 100
- Calculated remainder after dividing the indicated amount element's value by 100
- substring-before("ill-considered", "-")
- The string "ill"
Location Steps and Location Paths
Chapter 3 details both of these concepts. To get you started in XPath, here's a broad outline.
Most XPath expressions, by far, locate a document's contents or portions thereof. (Expressions such as the number 2001 and the string "2001" are exceptions; they don't locate anything, you might say, except themselves.) These pieces of content are located by way of one or more location steps — discrete units of XPath "meaning" — chained together, usually, into location paths.
This XPath expression from the above list:
consists of two location steps. The first locates the taxcuts child of the document root (that is, it locates the root element); the second locates all children of the preceding location step whose names are "taxcut." Taken together, these two location steps make up a complete location path.
As you can see from the previous examples, an XPath expression can be said to consist of various components: tokens and delimiters.
A token, in XPath as elsewhere in the XML world, is a simple, discrete string of Unicode characters. Individual characters within a token are not themselves considered tokens. If an XPath expression is analogous to a chemical molecule, the tokens of which it's composed are the atoms. (And the individual characters, I guess, are the sub-atomic particles.)
If quotation marks surround the token, it's assumed to be a string. If no quotation marks adorn the token, an XPath-smart application assumes that the token represents a node name. I'll have more to say about nodes and their names in a moment and much more to say about them throughout the rest of the book. For now, though, consider the first example listed above. The bare token taxcut is the name of a node. If I had put it in quotation marks, like "taxcut", the XPath expression wouldn't necessarily refer to anything in a particular document; it would simply refer to a string composed of the letters t, a, x, c, u, and t: almost certainly not what you want at all.
As a special case, a node name can also be represented with an asterisk (*). This serves as a wildcard (all nodes, regardless of their name) character. The expression taxcut/* locates all elements that are children of a taxcut element.
You cannot, however, use the asterisk in combination with other characters to represent portions of a name. Thus, tax* doesn't locate all elements whose names start with the string "tax"; it's simply illegal as far as XPath is concerned.
Tokens in an XPath expression are set off from one another using single-character delimiters, or pairs of them. Aside from quotation marks, these delimiters include:
- A forward slash separates a location step from the one that follows it. While I introduced location steps briefly above, Chapter 3 will discuss them at length.
- [ and ]
- Square brackets set off a predicate from the preceding portion of a location step. Again, detailed discussion of predicates is coming in Chapter 3. For now, understand that a predicate tests the expression preceding it for a true or false value. If true, the indicated node in the tree is selected; if false, it isn't.
- =, !=, <, >, <=, and >=
- These Boolean "delimiters" are used in a predicate to establish the true or false value of the test. Note that when used in an XML document, the markup-significant < and > characters must appear in their escaped forms to comply with XML's well-formedness constraints, even when used in attribute values. (For instance, to use the Boolean less-than-or-equal-to test, you must code the XPath expression as <=.) While XPath itself isn't expressed as an XML vocabulary, the documents in which XPath expressions most often appear are XML documents; therefore, well-formedness will haunt you in XPath just as elsewhere in the XML world.
- A double colon separates the name of an axis type from the name of a specific node (or set of nodes). Axes (more in Chapter 3) in XPath, as in plane and solid geometry, indicate some orientation within a space. In an XPath expression, an axis "turns the view" from a given starting point in the document. For instance, the attribute axis (abbreviated @) looks only at attributes of some element or set of elements.
- //, @, ., and ..
- Each of these — the double slash, at sign, period, and double period — is an abbreviated or shortcut form of an axis or location step. Respectively, these symbols represent the concepts of descendant-or-self, attribute, self, and parent (covered fully in Chapter 3).
- A pipe/vertical bar in an XPath expression functions as a Boolean union operator. This lets you chain together complete multiple expressions into compound location paths. Compound location paths are covered at the end of Chapter 3.
- ( and )
- Pairs of parentheses in XPath expressions, as in most other computer-language contexts, serve two purposes. They can be used for grouping subexpressions, particularly in cases where the ungrouped form would introduce ambiguities, and they can be used to set off the name of an XPath function from its argument list. Details on XPath functions appear in Chapter 4.
- +, -, *, div, and mod
- These five "delimiters" actually function as numeric operators: ways of combining numeric values to calculate some other value. Numeric operators are also covered in Chapter 4. Note that the asterisk can be used as either a numeric operator or as a wildcard character, depending on the context in which it appears. The expression tax*income multiplies the values of the tax and income elements and returns the result; it does not locate all elements whose names start with the string "tax" and end with the string "income."
- When not appearing within a string, whitespace can in some instances delimit tokens (and even other delimiters) for legibility, without changing the meaning of an expression. For instance, the two predicates [@year="2001"] and [@year = "2001"] are functionally identical, despite the presence in the second case of blank spaces before and after the =. Because the rules for when you can and can't use whitespace vary depending on context, I'll cover them in various places throughout the book.
Combining tokens and delimiters into complete expressions
While the rules for valid combinations of tokens and delimiters aren't spelled out explicitly anywhere, they follow the rules of common sense. (Whether the sense is in fact common depends a little on how comfortable you are with the concepts of location steps and location paths.)
For instance, the following is a syntactically illegitimate XPath expression; it also, if you think a little about it, doesn't make practical sense:
See the problem? First, for those of you who simply want to follow the rules without thinking about them, you can simply accept as a given that the / (unless used by itself) must be used as a delimiter between location steps; with no subsequent location step to the right, it's not separating book from anything.
Second, there's a more, well, let's call it a more philosophical problem. What exactly would the above expression be meant to say? "Locate a child of the book element which...." Which what? It's like a sentence fragment.
Note the difference here between XPath expressions and their counterparts in some other "navigational" languages, such as Unix directory commands and URIs. In these other contexts, a trailing slash might mean "all children of the present context" (such as a directory) or "the default child of the present context" (such as a web document named index.html or default.html). In XPath, few of these matters are implicit. If you want to get all children of the current context, follow the slash with something, such as an asterisk wildcard (to get all named children), as in book/*. Chapter 3 describes other approaches, particularly the use of the node( ) node test.
I'll cover these kinds of common-sense rules where appropriate. (See Chapter 3, especially.)
XPath Data Types
A careful reading of the previous material about XPath expressions should reveal that XPath is capable of processing four data types: string, numeric, Boolean, and nodes (or node-sets).
The first three data types I'll address in this section. Nodes and node-sets are easily the most important single XPath data type, so I've relegated them to a complete section in their own right, following this one.
You can find two kinds of strings, explicit and implicit, in nearly any XPath expression. Explicit (or literal) strings, of course, are strings of characters delimited by quotation marks. Now, don't get confused here. As I've said, XPath expressions themselves appear as attribute values in XML documents. Therefore, an expression as a whole will be contained in quotation marks. Within that expression, any literal strings must be contained in embedded quotation marks. If the expression as a whole is contained in double quotation marks, ", then a string within it must be enclosed in single quotation marks or apostrophes: '. If you prefer to enclose attribute values in single quotes, the embedded string(s) must appear in double quotes.
This nesting of literal quotation marks and apostrophes — or vice versa — is unnecessary, strictly speaking. If you prefer, you can escape the literals using their entity representations. That is, the expressions "a string" and "a string" are functionally identical. The former is simply more convenient and legible.
For example, in XSLT stylesheets, one of the most common attributes is select, applied to the xsl:value-of element (which is empty) and others. The value of this attribute is an XPath expression. So you might see code such as the following:
If the string "pathetic" were not enclosed in quotation marks, of course, it would be considered a node name rather than a string. (This might make sense in some contexts, but even in those contexts, it would almost certainly produce quite different results from the quoted form.) Note that the kind of quotation marks used in this example alternates between single and double as the quoted matter is nested successively deeper.
Explicitly quoted strings aside, XPath also makes very heavy use of what might be called implicit strings. They might be called that, that is, except there's already an official term for them: string-values. I will have more to say about string-values later in this chapter. For now, a simple example should suffice.
Consider the following fragment of an XML document:
Each element in an XML document has a string-value: the concatenated value of all text contained by that element's start and end tags. Therefore, the first type element here has a string-value of logical; the second, pathetic. An XPath expression in a predicate such as:
would be evaluated for the two elements, respectively, as:
That is, for the first type element the predicate would return the value true; for the second, false.
There's no special magic here. A numeric value in XPath terms is just a number; it can be operated on with arithmetic, and the result of that operation is itself a number. (XPath provides various facilities for converting numeric values to strings and vice versa. Detailed coverage of these facilities can be found in Chapter 4.) Formally, XPath numbers are all assumed to be floating-point numbers even when their explicit representation is as integers.
While XPath assumes all numbers to be of floating-point type, you cannot represent literal numbers in XPath using scientific notation. For example, many languages allow you to represent the number 1960 as 1.96E3 (that is, 1.96 times 10 to the 3rd power); such a value in XPath is not recognized as a legitimate number.
Although the XPath specification does not define "numeric-values" for nodes analogous to their string-values, XPath-aware applications can treat as numeric any string-value that can be "understood" as numeric. Thus, given this XML code fragment:
you can construct an XPath expression such as:
page_ref + 10
This would be understood as 23 (the numeric form of the page_ref element's string-value) plus 10, or 33.
The XPath specification also defines a special value, NaN, for simple "Is this value a number?" tests. ("NaN" stands for "not a number.") While the spec repeatedly refers to something called NaN, it doesn't show you how to use it except as a string (returned by the XPath string( ) function, as it happens). If you wanted to locate only those year elements which had legitimately numeric values, you could use an XPath expression something like this:
string(number(year)) != "NaN"
This explicitly attempts to convert the string-value of the year element to a number, then converts the result of that attempt to a string and compares it to the string "NaN." Only those year elements for which those two values are not equal (that is, only those year elements whose string-values are not "not a number") will pass.
The string( ) function, covered at length in Chapter 4, is extremely important in XPath. That's not because it's used that much in code — in my experience it isn't used much at all — rather, its importance is due to the XPath spec's being rife with phrases such as "...as if converted to a string using the string( ) function." As a practical matter, the string( ) function's use is implicit in many situations. From a certain standpoint, you could almost say that all an XML document's text content is understood by an XPath-aware application "as if converted to a string using the string( ) function."
As elsewhere, in XPath a Boolean value is one that equals either true or false. You can convert a Boolean value to the string or numeric data types, using XPath functions. The string form of the values true and false are (unsurprisingly) the strings "true" and "false"; their numeric counterparts are 1 and 0, respectively.
Probably the single most useful application of XPath Booleans is in the predicate portion of a location step. As I mentioned earlier, the predicate tests some candidate node to see if it fulfills some condition expressed as a Boolean true or false. Thus:
locates a concerto element only if its key attribute has a value of "F".
Importantly, as you will see in Chapter 3, the predicate's true or false value can also test for the simple existence of a particular node. If the node exists, the Boolean value of the predicate is true; if not, false. So:
locates a concerto element only if it has any key attribute at all.
Nodes and Node-Sets
The fourth and most important data type handled by XPath is the node-set data type.
Let's look first at nodes themselves. A node is any discrete logical something able to be located by an XPath location step. Every element in a document constitutes a node, as does every attribute, PI, and so on.
Each node in a document has various properties. I've discussed one of these properties briefly already — the string-value — and will provide more information about it at the end of this chapter. The others are its name, its sequence within the document, and its "family relationships" with other nodes.
Most (but not all) nodes have names. To understand node names, you need to understand three terms:
- qualified name
- This term, almost always contracted to "QName," is taken straight from the W3C "Namespaces in XML" spec, at http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml-names. The QName of a node, in general, is the identifier for the node as it actually appears in an instance document, including any namespace prefix. For example, an element whose start tag is <concerto> has a QName of "concerto"; if the start tag were <mml:concerto>, the QName would be "mml:concerto."
- The local-name of a node is its QName, sans any namespace prefix. If an element's QName is "mml:concerto," its local-name is "concerto." If there's no namespace in effect for a given node, its QName and local-name are identical.
- If the node is associated with a particular namespace, its expanded-name is a pair, consisting of the URI associated with that namespace and the local-name. Because the expanded-name doesn't consider the namespace prefix at all, two elements, for example, can have the same expanded-name even if their QNames are different, as long as both their associated namespace URIs (possibly null) and their local-names are identical. For more information, see Expanded but Elusive later in this chapter.
These three kinds of name conform to common sense in most cases, for most nodes, but can be surprising in others. When covering node types, below, I'll tell you how to determine the name of a node of a given type.
Nodes in a document are positioned within the document before or after other nodes. Take a look at this sample document:
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="invoice.xsl"?> <statement acct="112233"> <history> <credits> <payment date="2001-09-09" curr="EU">13.99</payment> <adjustment date="2001-09-30" curr="USD">12.64</adjustment> </credits> <debits> <fin_chg date="2001-09-09" curr="USD">1.98</fin_chg> </debits> </history> <current> <!-- No current charges for this customer? --> </current> </statement>
If you were an XML parser reading this document from start to finish, you'd be following normal document order. The xml-stylesheet PI comes before any of the elements in the document, the history element precedes the current element, the fin_chg element precedes the comment contained by the current element, and so on. Also note that XPath considers the attributes to a given element to come before that element's children and other descendants.
This all is pretty much common sense. Be careful when dealing with attributes, though: XPath considers an element's attributes to be in no particular document order at all. In the above document, whether the various date attributes are "before" the corresponding curr attributes is entirely XPath application dependent. As a practical matter, most XPath applications will probably be indexing attributes alphabetically, by their names — so each curr will precede its date counterpart. But you cannot absolutely count on this behavior.
As you'll see in Chapter 3, under the discussion of axes, it's also possible to access nodes in reverse document order.
XML's strict enforcement of document structure, even under simple well-formedness constraints, ensures that nodes don't just have a simple document order — even the "nodes" in a comma-separated values (or other plain text) file do that much — but also a set of more complex relationships to one another. Some nodes are parents of others (which are, in turn, children of their parents), and nodes may have siblings, ancestors, and so on.
Because these family relationships are codified in the concept of XPath axes, I'll defer further discussion of them until Chapter 3.
XPath doesn't for the most part deal in nodes, but in node-sets. A node-set is simply a collection of nodes, related to one another in some arbitrary way by means of an XPath location step (or full location path). In some cases, sure, a node-set might consist of a single node. But in most cases — especially when the location step is unqualified by a predicate — this is almost an accident, an artifact of the XML instance being navigated via XPath.
Here's a simple XML document:
<publications> <book>...</book> <book>...</book> <book>...</book> <magazine>...</magazine> </publications>
This location path:
returns a node-set consisting of three book elements. This location path:
returns a single magazine node. Technically, though, there's nothing inherent in this location path that forces only a single node to be located. This document just happens to have a single magazine element, and as a result, the location path locates a node-set that just happens in this case to consist of a single node.
This concept of node-sets returned by XPath radically departs from the more familiar counterparts in HTML hyperlinking. Under HTML, a hyperlink "gets" an entire document. This is true even if the given HTML link uses a fragment identifier, such as #top or #section1. (The whole document is still retrieved; it's simply positioned within the browser window in a particular way.) Using XPath, though, what you're manipulating is in most cases truly not the entire target document, but one or more discrete portions of it. In this sense, XPath isn't a "pointing-to" tool; it's an extraction tool.
Also worth noting at this point is that the term node-set carries some implicit baggage of meaning: like a set in mathematical terms, a node-set contains no duplicate nodes (although some may have duplicate string-values) and is intrinsically unordered. When you use XPath to locate as a node-set all elements in a document, there's no guarantee that you'll get the members of the node-set back in any particular sequence.
The kinds of node(-set)s retrievable by XPath cover, in effect, any kind of content imaginable: not just elements and attributes, but PIs, comments, and anything else you might find in an XML document. Let's take a look at these seven node types.
Conspicuously missing from the following list of "any kind of content imaginable" are entity references. There's no such thing as an "entity reference node," for example. Why not? Because by the time a document's contents are scanned by an XPath-aware application, they've already been processed by a lower-level application — the XML parser itself. All entity substitutions have already been made. By the same token, XPath can't locate a document's XML or DTDs, can't return to your application any of the contents of an internal DTD subset, and can't access (for example) tags instead of elements. XPath, in short, can't "read" a document lexically; it can only "read" it logically.
(See the short section, Section 188.8.131.52 later in this chapter, for a comparison of XPath node types with what the Infoset refers to as "information items.")
The root node
Every XML document has one and only one root node. This is the logical something that contains the entire document — not only the root element and all its contents, but also any whitespace, comments, or PIs that precede and follow the root element's start and end tags. This "something" is analogous to a physical file, but there may be no precise physical file to which the root node refers (especially in the case of XML documents generated or assembled on the fly and not saved in some persistent form).
In a location path, the root node is represented by a leading / (forward slash) character. Any location path that starts with / is an absolute location path, instructing the XPath-aware application, in effect, to start at the very top of the document before considering the location steps (if any) that follow. The root node does not have an expanded-name. Its local-name is an empty string.
Each element node in the document is composed of the element's start and end tags and everything in between. (Thus, when you retrieve a document's root element, you're retrieving everything in the document except any comments and PIs that precede or follow it.) Consider a simple code fragment:
<year> <month monthnum="4">April</month> <month monthnum="8">August</month> <month monthnum="12">December</month> <month monthnum="2">February</month> <month monthnum="1">January</month> <month monthnum="3">March</month> <month monthnum="5">May</month> <month monthnum="6">June</month> <month monthnum="7">July</month> <month monthnum="11">November</month> <month monthnum="10">October</month> <month monthnum="9">September</month> </year>
This location path (which says, "Locate all month children of the root year element whose monthnum attributes have the value 3"):
selects the sixth month element in the fragment — that is, the element whose contents (the string "March") are bounded by the <month monthnum="3"> start tag and the corresponding </month> end tag. To emphasize, and to repeat a point made early in this chapter: while the physical representation of the element is bounded by its start and end tags, XPath doesn't have any understanding at all of tags or any other markup. It just gets a particular invisible box corresponding to this physical representation and holding its contents. Importantly, though, it selects the element as a single node with various properties and subordinate objects (a name, a string-value, an attribute with its value).
Note especially that this example does not locate the third month element. It selects all month elements with the indicated monthnum attribute value.
You sometimes must take care, when selecting element nodes, not to be confused by the presence of "invisible whitespace" in their string-values.
Yes, true: all whitespace is invisible. (That's why it's called whitespace, right?) But the physical appearance of XML documents can trick you into thinking that some whitespace "doesn't count," even though that's not necessarily true. For instance, consider Figure 2-2, depicting a greatly simplified version of a document in the same vocabulary we've been using in this section.
In this figure, as you can see, there's no whitespace in any of the document's content, only within element start tags (and not always there). While many real-world XML documents (especially those that are machine generated) appear this way, it's just as likely that the documents you'll be excavating with XPath will look like Figure 2-3.
The human eye tends to ignore the whitespace-only blocks of text (represented with gray blocks in the figure) in a document like this one, discarding them as insignificant to the document's meaning. But XML parsers, bound by the XML spec's "all text counts" constraint, are not free to ignore these scraps of whitespace. (Some parsers may flag the whitespace as potentially "insignificant," leaving to some higher-order application the task of ignoring it or not.) So consider now the effect of an XPath expression such as the following, when applied to the document in Figure 2-3:
This location path doesn't return just the year element node, the month element node and its attribute. It also returns:
- Some blank spaces, a newline, and some more blank spaces preceding the month element
- A newline following the month element
Whether this will present you with a problem depends on your specific need. If it is a problem, there's an XPath function, normalize-space( ) (covered in Chapter 4), that trims all leading and trailing whitespace from a given element's content.
In XPath, as in many other XML-related areas, dealing with whitespace can induce either euphoria or migraines. In addition to the normalize-space( ) XPath function covered in Chapter 4, you should consider the (default or explicit) behavior of XML's own built-in xml:space attribute, and — depending on your application's needs — the effects of the XSLT xsl:strip-space and xsl:preserve-space elements, as well as the preserveWhiteSpace property of the MSXML Document object (if you're working in a Microsoft scripting environment).
The local-name of an element node is the name of the element type (that is, its generic identifier (GI), as it appears in the element's start and optional end tags). Thus, its expanded-name equals either its local-name (if there isn't a namespace in effect for that element) or its associated namespace URI paired with the local-name. Consider this code fragment:
<xsl:stylesheet version="1.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"> <xsl:template match="/"> <html> ... </html> </xsl:template> </xsl:stylesheet>
All elements in this document whose names carry the xsl: prefix are in the namespace associated with the URI "http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform." Thus, the expanded-name of the xsl:stylesheet element consists of that URI paired with the local-name, "stylesheet."
Attributes, in a certain sense, "belong to" the elements in which they appear, and in the same sense, they might be thought to adopt the namespace-related properties of those elements. For instance:
<xsl:template match="/" />
Logically, you might conclude that the match attribute is "in" the same namespace as the xsl:template element — it does, after all, belong to the same XML vocabulary — and that it, therefore, has something like an implied namespace prefix.
This isn't the case, though. An attribute's QName, local-name, namespace URI, and hence, expanded-name are all determined solely on the basis of the way the attribute is represented in the XML source document. Attributes such as match in the above example — with no explicit prefix — have a null namespace URI. That is, unprefixed attributes are in no namespace, including the default one; thus, their QName and local-name are identical.
Note that namespace declarations, which look like attributes (and indeed are attributes, according to the XML 1.0 and "Namespaces in XML" Recommendations), are not considered the same as other attributes when you're using XPath. As one example, the start tag of a typical xsl:stylesheet root element in a typical XSLT stylesheet might look something like this:
<xsl:stylesheet version="1.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
A location path intended to locate all this element's attributes might be:
(As a reminder, the wildcard asterisk here retrieves all attribute nodes, regardless of their names.) In fact, this location path locates only the version attribute. The xmlns:xsl and xmlns attributes, being namespace declarations instead of "normal" attributes, are not locatable as attribute nodes.
If the document referred to by the XPath expression is validated against a DTD, it may contain more attributes than are present explicitly — visibly — in the document itself. That's because the DTD may declare some attributes with default values in the event the document author has not supplied those attributes explicitly. Always remember that the "document" to which you're referring with XPath is the source document as parsed, which may be only more or less the source document that you "see" when reading it by eye.
Processing instructions, by definition, stand outside the vocabulary of an XML document in which they appear. Nonetheless, they do have names in an XPath sense: the name of a PI is its target (the identifier following the opening <? delimiter). For this PI:
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="mystyle.css"?>
the QName and local-name are both xml-stylesheet. However, because a PI isn't subject to namespace declarations anywhere in a document — PIs, like unprefixed attributes, are always in no namespace — its namespace URI is null.
The other thing to bear in mind when dealing with PI nodes is that their pseudo-attributes look like, but are not, real attributes (hence, the "pseudo-" prefix). From an XPath processor's point of view, everything between the PI target and the closing ?> delimiter is a single string of characters. In the case of the PI above, there's no node type capable of locating the type pseudoattribute separate from the href pseudoattribute, for example. (You can, however, use some of the string-manipulation functions covered in Chapter 4 to tease out the discrete pseudoattributes.)
Each comment in an XML source document may be located independently of the surrounding content. A comment has no expanded-name at all, and thus has neither a QName, a local-name, nor a namespace URI.
Any contiguous block of text — an element's #PCDATA content — constitutes a text node. By "contiguous" here I mean that the text is unbroken by any element, PI, or comment nodes. Consider a fragment of XHTML:
<p>A line of text.<br/>Another line.</p>
The p element here contains not just one but two text nodes, "A line of text." and "Another line." The intervening br element breaks them up into two. The presence or absence of whitespace in the #PCDATA content is immaterial. So in the following case:
<p>A line of text. Another line.</p>
there's still a single text node, which, like a comment, has no expanded-name at all.
Namespace nodes are the chimeras and Loch Ness monsters of XPath. They have characteristics of several other node types but at the same time are not "real," but rather fanciful creatures whose comings and goings are marked with footprints here and there rather than actual sightings.
The XPath spec says every element in a given document has a namespace node corresponding to each namespace declaration in scope for that element:
- One for every explicit declaration of a namespace prefix in the start tag of the element itself
- One for every explicit declaration of a namespace prefix in the start tag of any containing element
- One for the explicit xmlns= declaration, if any, of a namespace for unprefixed element/attribute nodes, whether this declaration appears in the element's own start tag or in that of a containing element
Here's a simple fragment of an XSLT stylesheet:
<xsl:stylesheet version="1.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <xsl:template match="/"> <html xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink/namespace"> ... </html> </xsl:template> </xsl:stylesheet>
Three explicit namespace declarations are made in this fragment:
- The xsl: namespace prefix is associated (in the xsl:stylesheet element's start tag) with the XSLT namespace URI, "http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform."
- The default namespace — that is, for any unprefixed element names appearing within the xsl:stylesheet element — is associated with the XHTML namespace, "http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml."
- The xlink: namespace prefix is associated (in the html element's start tag) with the namespace URI set aside by the W3C for XLink elements and attributes, "http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink/namespace."
There's also one other namespace implicitly in effect for all elements in this, and indeed any, XML document. That is the XML namespace itself, associated with the reserved xml: prefix. The corresponding namespace URI for this implied namespace declaration is "http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace."
The namespace declarations for the xsl: and default namespace prefixes both appear in the root xsl:stylesheet element's start tag; therefore, they create implicit namespace nodes on every element in the document — including those for which those declarations might not seem to make much sense. The html element, for instance, will probably not be able to make much use of the namespace node associated with the xsl: prefix. Nonetheless, in formal XPath terms that namespace node is indeed in force for the html element.
The namespace declaration for the xlink: prefix, on the other hand, is made by a lower-level element (html, here). Thus, there is no namespace node corresponding to that prefix for the higher-level xsl:template and xsl:stylesheet elements.
Each namespace node also has a local-name: the associated namespace prefix. So the local-name of the namespace node representing the XSLT namespace in the above document is "xsl." When associated with the default namespace, the namespace node's local-name is empty. The namespace URI of a namespace node, somewhat bizarrely, is always null.
In XPath, as in most — maybe all — XML-related subjects, namespaces sometimes seem like more trouble than they're worth. The basic purpose of namespaces is simple: to disambiguate the names of elements, and perhaps attributes, from more than one XML vocabulary when they appear in a single document instance. Yet the practice of using namespaces leads one down many hall-of-mirrors paths, with concepts and syntax nested inside other concepts and syntaxes and folding back on themselves.
As a practical matter, you will typically have almost no use for identifying or manipulating namespace nodes at all; your documents will consist entirely of elements and attributes from a single namespace.
XPath node types and the XML Infoset
The XML Information Set (commonly referred to simply as "the Infoset") is a W3C Recommendation published in October 2001 (http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-infoset/). Its purpose, as stated in the spec's Abstract, is to provide "a set of definitions for use in other specifications that need to refer to the information in an XML document."
The definitions the Infoset provides are principally in terms of 11 information items: document, element, attribute, processing-instruction, unexpanded entity reference, character, comment, document type declaration, unparsed entity, notation, and namespace. As you can see, there's a certain amount of overlap between this list and the node types available under XPath — and also a certain number of loose ends not provided at all by one or the other of the two Recommendations.
XPath 2.0 will resolve the conflicts in definitions of Infoset information items and XPath node types; at the same time, XPath will continue to need things the Infoset does not cover. For instance, XPath does not generally need to refer to atomic-level individual character information items. Instead, it needs to refer to the more "molecular" text nodes. For these "needed by XPath but not defined under the Infoset" information items, XPath 2.0 will continue to provide its own definitions.
For more information about XPath 2.0 and the Infoset, refer to Chapter 5.
It's hard to imagine a node in an XML document that exists in isolation, devoid of any context. First, as I've already mentioned, nodes have relationships with other nodes in the document — both document-order and "family" relationships. Maybe more importantly, but also more subtly, nodes in the node-set returned by a location path also have properties relative to the other nodes in that node-set — even when document order is irrelevant and family relationships, nonexistent. These are the properties of context size, context position, and namespace bindings.
Consider the following XML document:
<ChangeInMyPocket> <Quarters quantity="1"/> <Dimes quantity="1"/> <Nickels quantity="1"/> <Pennies quantity="3"/> <!-- No vending-machine purchase in my immediate future --> </ChangeInMyPocket>
It's possible, in a single location path, to locate only the four quantity attributes (or any three, two, or one of them) and the comment; or just the root node and the comment; or just the Quarters element, the Pennies element, and the quantity attribute of the Nickels element. The nodes in the resulting node-set need not share any significant formal relationship in the context of the document itself. But in all cases, these nodes suddenly acquire relationships to others in a given node-set, simply by virtue of their membership in that node-set.
The context size is simply the number of nodes in the node-set, irrespective of the type of nodes. A location path that returned a node-set of all element nodes in the above document would have a context size of 5 (one for each of the ChangeInMyPocket, Quarters, Nickels, Dimes, and Pennies elements). A location path returning all the quantity attributes and the comment would also have a context size of 5.
The context position is different for every member of the node-set: it's the integer representing the ordinal position that a given node holds in the node-set, relative to all other nodes in it, in document order. If a node-set consists of all child elements of the ChangeInMyPocket element, the Quarters element will have a context position of 1, the Dimes element, 2, and so on. In a different node-set, the Quarters element might be node 2 and Dimes, 1, and so on.
I've alluded to this before but just as a reminder: when determining context position, particularly of elements, be aware of "invisible whitespace" separating one element's end tag from the succeeding one's start tag. In the above document, a location path that retrieves all children of the ChangeInMyPocket element, not just the child elements, will also locate all the newline and space characters used for "pretty-printing"; each block of these characters constitutes a text-node child of ChangeInMyPocket. Thus, the Quarters element will have a context position of 2, the Dimes, 4, and so on.
Chapter 3 and Chapter 4 go into more detail about dealing with context position and context size. Note especially, in Chapter 3, the material about reverse document order in certain XPath axes, because this inverts the normal sequence of context positions.
The term namespace bindings refers to any namespace declarations in effect at the time an XPath expression is evaluated. In the previous document, which has no explicit namespace declarations, the only namespace binding in any expression's evaluation context will be the "built-in" namespace for elements and attributes whose names are prefixed xml:. Note that any namespace binding is not tied to a particular prefix, however; what's important is the URI to which the prefix is bound. Consider the following fragment:
<myvocab:root xmlns:myvocab="http://myvocab.com/namespace" xmlns:yourvocab="http://myvocab.com/namespace"> <yourvocab:subelem> [etc.] </yourvocab> </myvocab>
A superficial consideration of the namespace bindings in effect for the above yourvocab:subelem document might suggest that there are two, one for the myvocab: prefix and one for yourvocab:. Not true. There's only one namespace URI in play at that point (although it's aliased, after a fashion, by the two prefixes), and hence, there's only one namespace binding in that element node's context.
By definition, a well-formed XML document is a text document, incapable of containing such "binary" content as multimedia files and images. Thus, it stands to reason that in navigating XML documents via XPath the strings of text that make up the bulk of the document (aside from the element names themselves) would be of supreme importance. This notion is codified in the concept of string-values. And the importance of string-values lies in the fact that most of the time, when you locate a node in a document via XPath, what you're after is not the node per se but rather its string-value.
Each node returned by a location path has its own string-value. The string-value of a node depends on the node type, as summarized in Table 2-1. Note that the word "normalized" used to describe the string-value for the attribute node type is the same as elsewhere in the markup world: it means stripped of extraneous whitespace, by trimming leading and trailing whitespace and collapsing multiple consecutive occurrences of whitespace into a single space. For example, given an attribute such as region=" NW SE" (note leading blank spaces and multiple spaces between the "NW" and "SE"), its normalized value would be "NW SE". Also note, though, that this normalization depends on the attribute's type, as declared in a DTD or schema. If the attribute type is CDATA, those interior blank spaces would be assumed to be significant and not normalized. Therefore, if the region attribute is (say) of type NMTOKENS, the interior whitespace is collapsed; if it's CDATA, the whitespace remains.
Table 2-1. String-values, by node type
|Root||Concatenated value of all text nodes in the document|
|Element||Concatenated value of all text nodes within the scope of the element's start and end tags, including the text nodes contained by any descendant elements|
|Attribute||Normalized value of the attribute|
|PI||Everything in the PI between its target (and whitespace following the target) and the closing ?> delimiter|
|Comment||The comment's content — the text between the opening and closing <!-- and --> delimiters|
|Text||The character data in the node (note that every text node consists of at least one character)|
|Namespace||The namespace URI associated with the corresponding namespace prefix|
If you're using DOM, note that Table 2-1 establishes a loose correspondence between XPath string-values and the values returned by the DOM nodeValue method. The exceptions — and they're important ones — are that nodeValue, when applied to the document root and element nodes, returns not a concatenated string but a null value. The only way to get at these node types' text content through the DOM is to apply nodeValue to their descendant text nodes.
Consider an XML document such as the following:
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="4or5guys.xsl"?> <quotation xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <source> <author>Firesign Theatre</author> <work year="1970">Don't Crush that Dwarf, Hand Me The Pliers</work> </source> <text>And there's hamburger all over the highway in Mystic, Connecticut.</text> <!-- Following link last verified 2001-09-15 --> <allusion xlink:href="http://www.dern.com/ng_burgr.html"/> </quotation>
All seven XPath node types are present in this document. String-values for some of them are as follows:
- root node
- Concatenated values of all text nodes in the document, that is:
Firesign Theatre Don't Crush that Dwarf, Hand Me The Pliers And there's hamburger all over the Highway in Mystic, Connecticut.
(Note how the whitespace-only text nodes, included for legibility in the original document, are carried over into the string-value.)
- source element node
- Concatenated value of all text nodes within the element's scope (including whitespace-only text nodes):
Firesign Theatre Don't Crush that Dwarf, Hand Me The Pliers
- xml-stylesheet PI
- type="text/xsl" href="4or5guys.xsl"
- Following link last verified 2001-09-15
- first text node (not counting whitespace-only text nodes)
- Firesign Theatre
- namespace node on all elements
- The namespace for the xlink: prefix, declared in the root quotation element, does not apply to any elements, because none of their names use that prefix. All of these elements have empty strings because they are not in a namespace.
String-Value of a Node-Set
Not only does each node in a node-set have a string-value, as described above; the node-set as a whole has one.
If you followed the logic behind each of the previous examples, especially the concatenation of text nodes that makes up the string-value of a root or element node, you might think the string-value of a node-set containing (say) two or more element nodes is the concatenation of all their string-values. Not so. The string-value of a multinode node-set is the string-value of the first node in that node-set.
(Actually, the apparent inconsistency goes away if you just remember that last sentence, eliminating the word "multinode." Thus, the value of any single node is just a special case of the general rule; the node-set in this case just happens to be composed of a single node — which is, of course, the first in the node-set.)
In the previous example, the source element has two child element nodes, author and work. This location path:
thus returns a node-set of two nodes. The node-set's string-value is the string-value of the first node in the node-set, that is, the author element: "Firesign Theatre."
- ↑ Not that you'll see any further references to something by that name, in the spec or anywhere else.
- ↑ Depending on the context, such an unquoted token may also be interpreted as a function (covered in Chapter 4), a node test (see Chapter 3), or of course a literal number instead of a string.
- ↑ Note the importance here of quoting the string "NaN." If this code fragment had omitted the quotation marks, the XPath processor would not be testing for the special NaN value but for the string-value of an element whose name just happens to be NaN.
- ↑ XHTML, the "reformulation as XML" of the older HTML standard, is kind of a special case. Because an XHTML document is an XML document, it may use XPath-based XPointers in the value of an href attribute. But you can't assume that a browser, for now, will conform to the expected behavior of a true XPointer-aware application. Browser vendors don't exactly leap out of the starting gate to adopt new standards.