<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="http://commons.oreilly.com/wiki/skins/common/feed.css?97"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title>There is no Up or Down in Software - Revision history</title>
		<link>http://commons.oreilly.com/wiki/index.php?title=There_is_no_Up_or_Down_in_Software&amp;action=history</link>
		<description>Revision history for this page on the wiki</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.11.0</generator>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:13:46 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<item>
			<title>Mfeathers: New page: One of the most bedeviling terms in software is ''top-down design''.  Who decided that the caller is ''up'' and the ''callee'' is down?  Couldn't we look at software the other way around. ...</title>
			<link>http://commons.oreilly.com/wiki/index.php?title=There_is_no_Up_or_Down_in_Software&amp;diff=24654&amp;oldid=prev</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;New page: One of the most bedeviling terms in software is ''top-down design''.  Who decided that the caller is ''up'' and the ''callee'' is down?  Couldn't we look at software the other way around. ...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;One of the most bedeviling terms in software is ''top-down design''.  Who decided that the caller is ''up'' and the ''callee'' is down?  Couldn't we look at software the other way around.  Would it make a difference?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As humans we look for analogies and relationships.&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 22:03:59 GMT</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Mfeathers</dc:creator>			<comments>http://commons.oreilly.com/wiki/index.php/Talk:There_is_no_Up_or_Down_in_Software</comments>		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>